It is currently: Oct 21, '25, 4:51 pm |
Moderator: Everlong
The Legend wrote:Lose future draft picks? That's a lousy penalty for what the reward for winning by cheating - if true was. NFL should investigate this and wrp it up this week. If the Pats are found to of done it they should have to forfeit to the Colts.
Everlong wrote:The Legend wrote:Lose future draft picks? That's a lousy penalty for what the reward for winning by cheating - if true was. NFL should investigate this and wrp it up this week. If the Pats are found to of done it they should have to forfeit to the Colts.
Lol you HAVE to be kidding john. Like deflated footballs was the difference in a 45-7 game. Give me a break.
Several years ago, in an effort to prevent any doctoring of balls used in the kicking game, the NFL adopted a rule that six new, specially-marked kicking balls would be used for each game, with the boxes opened by the officials two hours and 15 minutes before kickoff.
All balls remain under the supervision of the referee until they are delivered to the ball attendant shortly before kickoiff.
The existence of the investigation, as initially reported by Bob Kravitz of WTHR-TV in Indianapolis, suggests that the referee failed to properly check the specifications of the balls, the referee didn’t properly secure the balls before they were given to the ball attendant, or something happened to the balls after they were given to the ball attendant.
The Legend wrote:Lose future draft picks? That's a lousy penalty for what the reward for winning by cheating - if true was. NFL should investigate this and wrp it up this week. If the Pats are found to of done it they should have to forfeit to the Colts.
Philip Rivers wrote:The Legend wrote:Lose future draft picks? That's a lousy penalty for what the reward for winning by cheating - if true was. NFL should investigate this and wrp it up this week. If the Pats are found to of done it they should have to forfeit to the Colts.
They didn't even do it. Everything the mainstream media says must hold some weight though, huh?
Yeah right.
Philip Rivers wrote:Innocent until proven guilty
The Legend wrote:Philip Rivers wrote:Innocent until proven guilty
That's very naieve of you. Where there's smoke there's fire. The media isn't on some witch hunt pulling stories out of thin air like every person trying to get away with something would love for you to believe. You gotta get over it. People do bad things, the media shines a light on those bad things. It's not the media's fault it's the people doing the bad things fault.
Even though I don't see this as a big deal. To call it a media creation is just false. This wasn't even in anyone's mind before the NFL stated they were investigating it. So unless the NFL is starting this "conspiracy" its something they thought was worth looking into. Its probably nothing substantial, but the NFL still thought enough of it to check.Philip Rivers wrote:The Legend wrote:Philip Rivers wrote:Innocent until proven guilty
That's very naieve of you. Where there's smoke there's fire. The media isn't on some witch hunt pulling stories out of thin air like every person trying to get away with something would love for you to believe. You gotta get over it. People do bad things, the media shines a light on those bad things. It's not the media's fault it's the people doing the bad things fault.
Id say what youre doing is being supportive of frivolous conspiracy.
Following the media, far more naieve. What exactly did they shine light on? There's nothing supporting this whack statement.
All the other shit you said is irrelevant jibber jabber. This isnt the life teachings forum.
Alpha Beast wrote:What I dont understand is how that got by the referees.
80 posts
• Page 1 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests