Rivers is the best QB in the AFC right now.

[Philip Rivers]

Manning is a close second. Yall mad?

[DanielsonTHAGOAT]

**Luck is a close second.

Yes, I agree.

[Philip Rivers]

Luck is 3rd. Manning beat him already.

[The Legend]

I would agree that he's played the best for the first month of the season, narrowly ahead of Peyton Manning. Luck is definitely a distant third.

[Philip Rivers]

[Romo]

If I was Rivers I'd be hoping that they continue to not talk about it.

[Messiah]

Where's his rings?????

[Everlong]

Philip Rivers can't be the best quarterback right now, because Joe Flacco had four really good games two years ago.

[Kyle]

Philip Rivers can't be the best quarterback right now, because Joe Flacco had four really good games two years ago.

Oh snap.

[The Legend]

He also can't because he isn't even the best quarterback in his own division.

[Philip Rivers]

He also can't because he isn't even the best quarterback in his own division.

But he's the MVP of the league right now. So if he's better this season than every Quarterback, he's the best QB in the NFL.

But he's the MVP of the league right now. So if he's better this season than every Quarterback, he's the best QB in the NFL.

That's pretty hilarious, it'd be even more funny if it was actually the reason I gave.

[Messiah]

But it was the reason you gave. You said Flacco was better because he won a Super Bowl and Cam Newton has not. You did not say anything about Flacco's actual performance on the field in regards to accuracy, pocket presence, mobility, deep ball, etc., because you are too hung on wins and losses. You said Newton couldn't possibly be better. And in fact, you said Eli Manning was better than Philip Rivers too for the same reason.

Why are you backtracking for your boy? Rivers has never came close to having a postseason run like Flacco had AND Flacco has been a more consistent winner so by YOUR LOGIC, how is Rivers better than Flacco?

Or let me guess... "it's different" right? Maybe when you actually establish your argument beyond wins and losses and actually discuss qualities such as accuracy, pocket presence, consistency, footwork, ability to not turn the ball over at a high rate, etc., then people will actually take your arguments seriously.

And there actually exists for a legitimate argument for Flacco over Newton if you so choose to take it. Flacco has a better deep ball. Newton's footwork is more shaky than Flacco's, although Flacco isn't great at it either. Cam, although much better at it this year, has in the past had difficulty making quick decisions with the ball (then again, Flacco sucks at this too).

However, instead of making a quality argument on the side of Flacco, you only focus on a team stat in the most team oriented sport.

[DanielsonTHAGOAT]

Peyton said "not anymore"

[CubsIn5]

Luck is 3rd. Manning beat him already.

[Chewy]

Bzzzzt.

Sorry Jim. The correct answer is d. Cam Newton.

[Everlong]

Yeah, Manning has definitely surpassed Rivers after Thursday night's game. And you could definitely make a case for Luck as well.

[Messiah]

You know I have to do it.

I felt bad for Rivers throughout that game. Dumb decision by him on the INT but Miami tore that offensive line up. Rivers was shell shocked. Chargers have so many injuries, I think they might be finished. Then again Rivers in December is God.

[Everlong]

Yeah Chargers have been exposed bad in recent weeks, they can't keep up with good teams with all those injuries. Rivers had it rough today.

[Philip Rivers]

All of these great defensive lines have been destroying us the past few weeks. His play will rebound but I don't know how the rest of our team does.

[DanielsonTHAGOAT]

So is Big Ben the best QB in the AFC now?