It is currently: Oct 20, '25, 11:21 am

WWE isn't so bad regarding race

Talk about what's going on in the WWE in this forum!

Moderator: Str8Shooter

Re: WWE isn't so bad regarding race

Postby The Legend » Feb 14, '15, 2:50 pm

Hanley! wrote:Daz and Sortacreative have covered much of what I was going to say, but I want to make one additional point that I think is important: The Japanese should in no way be setting the standard here.

America is not just a more liberal country, it's a far more multi-cultural country. The English speaking world is massive compared to the Japanese speaking world, and even just within America itself, there is a far greater diversity of races and ethnicities.

Looking at the NJPW roster, the percentage of Japanese talent to foreign talent is probably not representative of the country as a whole. There's actually less diversity in that country than what they're showing us in NJPW. Meanwhile, on WWE television it's the exact opposite. The range of talent that they present on television, particularly towards the top of their roster, is not representative of the American population. There is more racial and cultural diversity in America than what is depicted on television.

Which also puts the lie to the idea that it's okay for WWE to just push white Americans because people like to watch performers that are similar to them. This suggests that the American audience consists almost entirely of white people born in America. The notion gets even sillier when you realise that WWE is not even an American company. It's an international company, tours and airs shows all over the world, and likes to brag about that fact. They have a much broader audience than NJPW and should be catering to a broader audience. Not just the one they're most comfortable with.

Also the way WWE saddles people of other races with offensive stereotypes as gimmicks is another massive part of the problem in that company, but I've talked about that before and the others have already covered it in this topic.

Overall when it comes to race, NJPW are doing pretty good considering, and WWE are doing pretty bad in general.


Oh yes, I've been waiting for the "America should be set to a higher standard" response.
  • 0

Image

Credit to Tim/Everlong for this awesome sig
User avatar
The Legend None specified
World Champion
World Champion
 
12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership
 
Topic Author
Posts: 5641
Topics: 331
Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013
Reputation: 1830

Re: WWE isn't so bad regarding race

Postby The Legend » Feb 14, '15, 2:51 pm

Str8Shooter wrote:
The Legend wrote:I don't even know why I try with some of you people.


Hey I'm on your side in a lot of the debate threads :lol

I just don't think you have a leg to stand on in this argument. As someone who at least semi regularly watches New Japan I don't recall ever once thinking that the foreign talent were being mistreated or miscast in favour of Japanese talents. If anything I'm impressed with how they are handled. In fact there's probably people in Japan who would argue that they might be getting too much of a push.


For the record you weren't one of the people I was referring to.
  • 0

Image

Credit to Tim/Everlong for this awesome sig
User avatar
The Legend None specified
World Champion
World Champion
 
12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership
 
Topic Author
Posts: 5641
Topics: 331
Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013
Reputation: 1830

Re: WWE isn't so bad regarding race

Postby EmperorWu » Feb 14, '15, 6:23 pm

@The Legend - Dude if you can't even come up with logical and factual counter arguments... why even bother? You tried to make a point, got torn to shreds, then just went on the defensive but didn't bother to make any legitimate retorts. Tap out brother. If you want to keep this going I'll throw my hat in, but give us something to debate against.

The Legend wrote:Let's not forget the WWE is based in America. Also, the Bullet Club are portrayed as heels as we've already covered.


Since this was about the only thing not directly responded to yet. Although someone already made the point I'm going to make before you posted this.

So what if they're heels? What does that prove in any way shape or form? Tons of heels throughout wrestling history have been treated with respect and dignity. Being a heel is supposed to be based on the actions of the individual or his stable, not the color of their skin. From what little I've seen, Bullet Club is judged by the content of their character. Now let's go to WWE were the primary reason a guy is heel is based on the fact that he's a foreigner. He's Muslim, Iranian, Russian as a current on going example. Bullet Club are not presented as small minded stereotypes. Can we forget Cryme Tyme, the Mexicools, or New Days for another current on going example.

The point that being a heel is on par with a stereotype is frankly delusional. Your argument stands even more poorly when you realize you're basing it on false assumptions. Simply put WWE isn't in better light compared to NJPW because NJPW seems to treat their foreigners much more equitably. And last but not least, it doesn't really matter at all how another promotion treats people, that does not absolve WWE if its sins.
  • 11

Image
User avatar
EmperorWu Male
Next Big Thing
Next Big Thing
 
10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership
 
Posts: 1049
Topics: 62
Age: 37
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015
Location: Marysville, Washington
Reputation: 567

Re: WWE isn't so bad regarding race

Postby SortaCreative » Feb 14, '15, 6:51 pm

^ You should start "wooing" at the end of your posts.

But instead of woo! it's Wu!
  • 2

Image
Irin
SortaCreative Male
Next Big Thing
Next Big Thing
 
12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership
 
Posts: 1560
Topics: 54
Age: 38
Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013
Location: England, UK
Reputation: 1211
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: WWE isn't so bad regarding race

Postby Hanley! » Feb 14, '15, 7:18 pm

The Legend wrote:Oh yes, I've been waiting for the "America should be set to a higher standard" response.


Do you disagree? Or did you even read what I wrote? I made it pretty clear why the standard both should be higher in America, and why it was actually far lower.

NJPW is a company catering primarily to one country and it still showcases a much larger percentage of foreigners than is found in their population. WWE is an international company catering to countries across the world, running out of one of the most culturally diverse countries in the world and they showcase less foreigners and people of alternate ethnicities, and they treat them with less respect.

I'm going to take the controversial opinion that this is a bad thing.

But if you want to act like I'm just taking a shot at America somehow then be my guest.
  • 0

User avatar
Hanley! Male
World Champion
World Champion
 
12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership
 
Posts: 5605
Topics: 165
Age: 38
Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Reputation: 3988

Re: WWE isn't so bad regarding race

Postby VaderBomb » Feb 14, '15, 9:05 pm

The Legend wrote:
VaderBomb wrote:Lies. The level of gaijins has always fluctuated but there's always a healthy load of them. NJPW has always been pretty fair considering it's roster diversity.

When was the last time a Japanese wrestler has been treated as a top contender in the WWE?

Oh yeah... never.


When was the last time the WWE had a Japanese wrestler you wanted them to treat as a top contender?


That's where the beginning of the problem lies and with that sentence you prove that WWE are pretty bad regarding race.

I mean hell, there's never been a black WWE Champion! It's outrageous.
  • 0

User avatar
VaderBomb Male
Ring General
Ring General
 
12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership
 
Posts: 2086
Topics: 177
Age: 37
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Reputation: 1332

Re: WWE isn't so bad regarding race

Postby flock u » Feb 14, '15, 9:34 pm

WWE's track record says it all in their entire history only ONE Black man got to be a world champion without having to adopt a WHITE gimmick lol. Hell just look what they did to Tony Atlas in the early 90's lol they literally made him a spear chucker.

VaderBomb wrote:
The Legend wrote:
VaderBomb wrote:Lies. The level of gaijins has always fluctuated but there's always a healthy load of them. NJPW has always been pretty fair considering it's roster diversity.

When was the last time a Japanese wrestler has been treated as a top contender in the WWE?

Oh yeah... never.


When was the last time the WWE had a Japanese wrestler you wanted them to treat as a top contender?


That's where the beginning of the problem lies and with that sentence you prove that WWE are pretty bad regarding race.

I mean hell, there's never been a black WWE Champion! It's outrageous.


there have been two world champs who were black in WWE Mark Henry and Booker T Granted though Booker T had to adopt a white gimmick before he got the belt lol Henry though got to stay black while he had his run
  • 0

flock u Male
Jobber
Jobber
 
11 years of membership11 years of membership11 years of membership11 years of membership11 years of membership11 years of membership11 years of membership11 years of membership11 years of membership11 years of membership11 years of membership
 
Posts: 153
Topics: 3
Age: 37
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2014
Location: Davenport Iowa
Reputation: 80

Re: WWE isn't so bad regarding race

Postby EmperorWu » Feb 14, '15, 10:00 pm

Booker T had already been world champ before the WWE, so I would argue that Mark Henry is the only legit World Champ made by WWE. As for WWE championship there have been zero, unless you really want to count the Rock. Either way. This is still proving people's point about the WWE.
  • 0

Image
User avatar
EmperorWu Male
Next Big Thing
Next Big Thing
 
10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership
 
Posts: 1049
Topics: 62
Age: 37
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015
Location: Marysville, Washington
Reputation: 567

Re: WWE isn't so bad regarding race

Postby Messiah » Feb 14, '15, 10:38 pm

flock u wrote:there have been two world champs who were black in WWE Mark Henry and Booker T Granted though Booker T had to adopt a white gimmick before he got the belt lol Henry though got to stay black while he had his run


What?
  • 0

Image
User avatar
Messiah Male
Main Eventer
Main Eventer
 
12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership
 
Posts: 3235
Topics: 472
Joined: Wed Oct 9, 2013
Location: Straight Cash Inc. Headquarters
Reputation: 2139

Re: WWE isn't so bad regarding race

Postby BSM » Feb 14, '15, 11:23 pm

EmperorWu wrote:Booker T had already been world champ before the WWE, so I would argue that Mark Henry is the only legit World Champ made by WWE. As for WWE championship there have been zero, unless you really want to count the Rock. Either way. This is still proving people's point about the WWE.


The lack of black world champions isn't exclusive to WWE. It seems to be pretty common across the American promotions.

In WWE, you have one WWE champ(if you count the Rock,who is half black), and if you stretch it to include the other semi-important titles, you can get a total of 4(Rock, Booker T and Mark Henry were World Heavyweight Champions, and Bobby Lashley held the ECW title). And yes, I realize adding the ECW title is probably stretching it.

WCW had two black world champions (Booker and Ron Simmons)

TNA hah had two (Ron Killings and Lashley)

I don't believe ROH has had a black champion, but I could very well be wrong.

I think part of the cause of black world champions is a lack of black wrestlers in general. At any given time, their only seems to be at most 10-15 black competitors on a given roster, including females. With such a small pool to choose from, the odds of finding a legitimate contender lower dramatically. Sure, there probably should have been more black world champions than there have been, but how many would have made deserving champions?

Booker T and Mark Henry were probably deserving of being WWE champions, but who else, especially recently?
Kofi Kingston? Shelton Benjamin? Lashley? Titus O'Neil? Maybe, I don't know. My point is there just doesn't seem to be a lot to choose from.
  • 0

Image
User avatar
BSM Male
Indy Darling
Indy Darling
 
12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership
 
Posts: 226
Topics: 3
Age: 36
Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013
Reputation: 178

Re: WWE isn't so bad regarding race

Postby VaderBomb » Feb 15, '15, 2:01 am

flock u wrote:WWE's track record says it all in their entire history only ONE Black man got to be a world champion without having to adopt a WHITE gimmick lol. Hell just look what they did to Tony Atlas in the early 90's lol they literally made him a spear chucker.

VaderBomb wrote:
The Legend wrote:
VaderBomb wrote:Lies. The level of gaijins has always fluctuated but there's always a healthy load of them. NJPW has always been pretty fair considering it's roster diversity.

When was the last time a Japanese wrestler has been treated as a top contender in the WWE?

Oh yeah... never.


When was the last time the WWE had a Japanese wrestler you wanted them to treat as a top contender?


That's where the beginning of the problem lies and with that sentence you prove that WWE are pretty bad regarding race.

I mean hell, there's never been a black WWE Champion! It's outrageous.


there have been two world champs who were black in WWE Mark Henry and Booker T Granted though Booker T had to adopt a white gimmick before he got the belt lol Henry though got to stay black while he had his run


Booker T and Mark Henry held the World Heayvweight Championship which was 100% second tier when both Booker and Henry held them.

There has never been a black WWE Champion.
  • 0

User avatar
VaderBomb Male
Ring General
Ring General
 
12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership
 
Posts: 2086
Topics: 177
Age: 37
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Reputation: 1332

Re: WWE isn't so bad regarding race

Postby Circled Square » Feb 15, '15, 2:20 am

Maybe it's because they weren't good enough. Don't forget The Rock is part black as well. Name one other black wrestler (hell, half black) that deserved to be a top dog and could be top tier.

protip: you can't

protip2: Mark Henry's hall of pain was the B tier show
  • 0

User avatar
Circled Square Male
Next Big Thing
Next Big Thing
 
10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership
 
Posts: 1869
Topics: 209
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2015
Reputation: 572

Re: WWE isn't so bad regarding race

Postby VaderBomb » Feb 15, '15, 2:37 am

Circled Sqaure wrote:Maybe it's because they weren't good enough. Don't forget The Rock is part black as well. Name one other black wrestler (hell, half black) that deserved to be a top dog and could be top tier.

protip: you can't

protip2: Mark Henry's hall of pain was the B tier show


Really?

Bobo Brazil, Booker T, Junkyard Dog, Ron Simmons, Shelton Benjamin, and D'Lo Brown all had the talent to be WWF/E Champion but were never allowed the opportunity or the time to showcase what they were capable of to their fullest capacity.

Not to mention the countless black wrestlers who were never signed despite clearly having the talent. If I were to begin that list it would be endless.

I'm not necessarily saying that there's a racist conspiracy but it's bullshit, nonetheless. WWE clearly caters to and abides by a majorly white audience.
  • 0

Last edited by VaderBomb on Feb 15, '15, 3:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
VaderBomb Male
Ring General
Ring General
 
12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership
 
Posts: 2086
Topics: 177
Age: 37
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Reputation: 1332

Re: WWE isn't so bad regarding race

Postby PorkChop » Feb 15, '15, 2:45 am

Remember when Triple H looked Booker T up and down, and said "people like him" shouldn't be world champion, and demanded Booker did a dance to entertain him?

PM me when NJPW put on a promo like that and I'll start listening.
  • 0

User avatar
PorkChop Male
Creative Team
World Champion
World Champion
 
12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership
 
Posts: 7104
Topics: 1430
Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013
Reputation: 2126

Re: WWE isn't so bad regarding race

Postby Circled Square » Feb 15, '15, 2:54 am

VaderBomb wrote:
Circled Sqaure wrote:Maybe it's because they weren't good enough. Don't forget The Rock is part black as well. Name one other black wrestler (hell, half black) that deserved to be a top dog and could be top tier.

protip: you can't

protip2: Mark Henry's hall of pain was the B tier show


Really?

Bobo Brazil, Booker T, Junkyard Dog, Ron Simmons, Shelton Benjamin, and D'Lo Brown all had the talent to be WWF/E Champion but were never allowed the opportunity or the time to showcase what they were capable of to their fullest capacity.

Not to mention the countless black wrestlers who were never signed despite clearly having the talent. If I were to begin that list it would be endless. Homicide could have been the top heel for years in WWE.

I'm not necessarily saying that there's a racist conspiracy but it's bullshit, nonetheless. WWE clearly caters to and abides by a majorly white audience.


Dolph Ziggler, Mr. Kennedy, Ted DiBease Jr, Chuck Palumbo (lol), Trevor Murdoch and Luke Gallows all had talent to be the WWF/E champion but were never allowed the opportunity or the time to showcase what they were capable of to their fullest capacity.

Not to mention the countless of white wrestlers who were never signed despite clearly having th-...you see where I'm going here?

The superstars have to connect with the audience. Few black wrestlers in the past fifteen years have made a connection. Booker T did, he stuck around as a mid carder/stop-gap champion. Shelton was good in the ring, crap on the mic. Cryme Tyme was a bad one IMO, that was just a little bit much, but they were entertaining and at times well written, but blacks get gimmicks that are, well, gimmicky. Kofi being Jamaican was another one. R-Truth to some extent, but they based his character around his insanity, even though he was what's upping for a few years.

Anyway, there is no conspiracy. More white people watch/watched WWE, that's your target audience. It's like kids and the influence of the PG era. My favorite memory of SD the past five years was Mark Henry's Hall Of Pain run and he connected. It's no conspiracy. His character clicked. Who gave two fucks about D'Lo Brown? I didn't. Bobo Brazil looks terrible from what I've seen. That's just my opinion though.
  • 0

User avatar
Circled Square Male
Next Big Thing
Next Big Thing
 
10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership
 
Posts: 1869
Topics: 209
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2015
Reputation: 572

Re: WWE isn't so bad regarding race

Postby Daz » Feb 15, '15, 3:01 am

Maybe a black wrestler would connect with an audience better if they weren't saddled with an intelligence insulting, stereotype of the gimmick, such as the New Day.
  • 0

Image
Click image to get your tits blown off by my literary prowess.
User avatar
Daz Male
Referee
Ring General
Ring General
 
12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership
 
Posts: 2885
Topics: 25
Age: 35
Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013
Reputation: 1382

Re: WWE isn't so bad regarding race

Postby Circled Square » Feb 15, '15, 3:05 am

Daz wrote:Maybe a black wrestler would connect with an audience better if they weren't saddled with an intelligence insulting, stereotype of the gimmick, such as the New Day.

You can give them whatever gimmick, it doesn't matter. Kofi for instance would have been a main event player if Orton (if I remember the story correctly) complained about something, maybe a botch? And boom, his push got halted. Big E is shit and will always be shit. Titus O'Neil is a good black wrestler who is push worthy. R-Truth is old and had a solid career, Xavier Woods is shit.
  • 0

User avatar
Circled Square Male
Next Big Thing
Next Big Thing
 
10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership
 
Posts: 1869
Topics: 209
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2015
Reputation: 572

Re: WWE isn't so bad regarding race

Postby VaderBomb » Feb 15, '15, 3:22 am

Circled Sqaure wrote:
VaderBomb wrote:
Circled Sqaure wrote:Maybe it's because they weren't good enough. Don't forget The Rock is part black as well. Name one other black wrestler (hell, half black) that deserved to be a top dog and could be top tier.

protip: you can't

protip2: Mark Henry's hall of pain was the B tier show


Really?

Bobo Brazil, Booker T, Junkyard Dog, Ron Simmons, Shelton Benjamin, and D'Lo Brown all had the talent to be WWF/E Champion but were never allowed the opportunity or the time to showcase what they were capable of to their fullest capacity.

Not to mention the countless black wrestlers who were never signed despite clearly having the talent. If I were to begin that list it would be endless. Homicide could have been the top heel for years in WWE.

I'm not necessarily saying that there's a racist conspiracy but it's bullshit, nonetheless. WWE clearly caters to and abides by a majorly white audience.


Dolph Ziggler, Mr. Kennedy, Ted DiBease Jr, Chuck Palumbo (lol), Trevor Murdoch and Luke Gallows all had talent to be the WWF/E champion but were never allowed the opportunity or the time to showcase what they were capable of to their fullest capacity.

Not to mention the countless of white wrestlers who were never signed despite clearly having th-...you see where I'm going here?

The superstars have to connect with the audience. Few black wrestlers in the past fifteen years have made a connection. Booker T did, he stuck around as a mid carder/stop-gap champion. Shelton was good in the ring, crap on the mic. Cryme Tyme was a bad one IMO, that was just a little bit much, but they were entertaining and at times well written, but blacks get gimmicks that are, well, gimmicky. Kofi being Jamaican was another one. R-Truth to some extent, but they based his character around his insanity, even though he was what's upping for a few years.

Anyway, there is no conspiracy. More white people watch/watched WWE, that's your target audience. It's like kids and the influence of the PG era. My favorite memory of SD the past five years was Mark Henry's Hall Of Pain run and he connected. It's no conspiracy. His character clicked. Who gave two fucks about D'Lo Brown? I didn't. Bobo Brazil looks terrible from what I've seen. That's just my opinion though.


Your counter-argument is flawed. You asked if any black wrestlers deserved to be world champion, and then claim that my response has no merit because there have also been white dudes who haven't gotten a proper push? The reality is that out of the 43 men who have held the WWE Championship, only seven of them are not white and none of them are black. If they were't allowed to showcase their ability (which I agree that also happens to wrestlers of all races), then how can you possibly judge them?

Your argument proves (by name-dropping forgettable and low-end workers like DiBiase Jr, Palumbo and Trevor Murdoch) that WWE has allowed more white wrestlers onto the main roster, and the fact that I have a much smaller pool to reel in from considering black performers only solidifies my point.

You can't limit the talent of these people who were hardly allowed to showcase their abilities, despite their race. But in the end, there still has yet to be a black WWE Champion and NJPW is much fairer to foreign talent considering their audience and roster. I stand by my assessment that any of those wrestlers that I named could have been the top champion in their prime and like the Japanese, WWE have hardly been chomping at the bit to sign any of the ridiculously talented black wrestlers who exist and compete within this artistic landscape.
  • 4

User avatar
VaderBomb Male
Ring General
Ring General
 
12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership
 
Posts: 2086
Topics: 177
Age: 37
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Reputation: 1332

Re: WWE isn't so bad regarding race

Postby Circled Square » Feb 15, '15, 3:36 am

The reason why you have a smaller pool is because WRESTLING IS NOT A BLACK SPORT. It just isn't. it has no meaning to black people. Not many kids who have athletic talent dream of being a wrestler, let alone black kids. You have a smaller pool to pick from because the amount of black wrestlers is smaller compared to the majority of other races. Titus O'Neil may have been interested in wrestling, but chose football instead. Sure, the indy's have been kinder, but the indies are a lot kinder to mid-card level talent. So say the majority of wrestlers are white, it means more often than not they will be the guys getting the top push. These crazy talented black wrestlers you speak of don't fit my definition of crazy talented. I grasped at straws when I listed mid-card level white talent, but there's much more.

Paul London
Brian Kendrick
Matt Hardy
Test
Jindrak
Carlito (not white but hey)

No conspiracy. Just bad timing, creative's got nothing for you and at times, bad booking. All of those three can happen to Nwankwo Deng to Sun Ming Pao. Doesn't matter.
  • 0

User avatar
Circled Square Male
Next Big Thing
Next Big Thing
 
10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership
 
Posts: 1869
Topics: 209
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2015
Reputation: 572

Re: WWE isn't so bad regarding race

Postby Daz » Feb 15, '15, 3:41 am

Circled Sqaure wrote:The reason why you have a smaller pool is because WRESTLING IS NOT A BLACK SPORT. It just isn't. it has no meaning to black people. Not many kids who have athletic talent dream of being a wrestler, let alone black kids. You have a smaller pool to pick from because the amount of black wrestlers is smaller compared to the majority of other races. Titus O'Neil may have been interested in wrestling, but chose football instead.


And any point you may have had in this discussion just went flying out the window.
  • 1

Image
Click image to get your tits blown off by my literary prowess.
User avatar
Daz Male
Referee
Ring General
Ring General
 
12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership
 
Posts: 2885
Topics: 25
Age: 35
Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013
Reputation: 1382

 

PreviousNext

Return to WWE

Who is Online Now?

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

Reputation System ©'